The final week of the Dezeen 15 digital festival saw former MIT professor Neri Oxman unveil details of her new Manhattan studio, while Aric Chen called for the manifestos to be killed.
Throughout the festival, a total of 15 creatives presented ideas on how to change the world over the next 15 years. From November 1 to 19, it featured a different manifesto and a live interview each day of the week. See the program here.
Read on for some of the highlights from week three:
Neri Oxman launches new studio to “contribute to a better world”
Day 15: Architect and designer Oxman used his Dezeen 15 manifesto and accompanying film to define the vision for his new studio.
“We see it as a kind of 21st century Bell Labs,” she said in a live interview, comparing it to the legendary innovation department of US telecommunications giant AT&T.
The department is considered one of the most important research laboratories of the 20th century, a pioneer in the development of technologies such as lasers, transistors and photovoltaics.
Oxman spoke to Dezeen live from the unfinished studio space at 787 11th Avenue, which she said will house “an architectural studio, a wet lab, a biomechatronics and electronics store, and a machine shop. “.
“This will be a place where interdisciplinary design across scales, problem contexts and domains can take place,” said Oxman, who previously led the Mediated Matter Group at MIT.
“It is in the same spirit as the Mediated Matter Group, but this time around doesn’t stop at speculative design, but examines how those designs could actually contribute to a better world by taking on the world’s controls. real.”
In addition to the manifesto, film, and interview, Oxman wrote about two of his projects to help explain his philosophy, describing the Synthetic Apiary II project which studies how bees build beehives and the Aguahoja III pavilion made. robotically.
Cultural institutions must ‘turn words into action’, says Aric Chen
Day 11: The new head of Rotterdam’s Het Nieuwe Instituut has abandoned the notion of wordy manifestos to “lead most often to empty platitudes at best and totalitarian visions at worst”.
Instead, institutions like her need to replace speculation with a more proactive form of “implemented speculation,” Chen wrote in his manifesto.
“Designing individual products is a short-term reflection,” says Natsa Audrey Chieza
Day 12: Natsai Audrey Chieza called on designers to help ensure that emerging biotechnologies are used to create a fair future. It means helping to design systems within which these technologies can thrive.
“If we want a truly fair future, we have to create the circumstances under which this can happen,” she wrote in her manifesto. “Inequality is a design choice. Design creates and perpetuates these systems. It can also transform them.
“We offer externalities as a measure of sustainability,” says Joseph Grima
Day 13: Joseph Grima’s manifesto calls for a new type of non-extractive architecture that exploits neither human nor natural resources. This would avoid “externalities”, which are costs imposed on third parties without their consent.
Instead, Grima suggests that externalities should be measured as part of an architecture project with architects working to eliminate them.
“The reality is that a much broader and more ambitious reassessment of human activities is urgently needed,” he wrote in his manifesto. “Instead of energy efficiency, we suggest looking at externalities as a measure of sustainability.”
Superflux offers a new design vocabulary which replaces “fix” by “heal”
Day 14: Superflux co-founders Anab Jain and Jon Ardern called for an end to “human exceptionalism” in their manifesto, exposing new terminology that could help destructive tendencies in humanity.
“Fix” should be replaced by “take care” for example, while “plan” would be abandoned in favor of “gardening”.
“Our actions have caused disastrous imbalances,” they write in their manifesto. “We believe that humanity needs to think beyond itself.”